Here’s How Russian-Made Buk Missile Systems Shot Down Flight MH17, In 9.86 Seconds

Pin It

Jul 19 2014
Linked In

There’re only two countries who know exactly what happened to Malaysian Flight MH17, which was shot down, killing all 298 people including 3 infants and 15 crew onboard. They’re United States and Russia obviously. But whether they want to tell the world the real story or otherwise is another matter. In spite of a commercial aircraft being blown off in the sky, the matter is more complicated than ordinary Joes’ and Janes’ would think.


Any executive decision by both superpowers needs to be decided with geo-political and military impact in mind. They have all the sophisticated technology that monitor each other in real-time. The U.S. operates fleets of listening satellites and early warning satellites that could have identified the location of a missile launch site and its trajectory as it shot the Malaysian aircraft. The Pentagon would have easily detected the launch because of its heat signature.

U.S. Air Force Defense Support Program satellites

The U.S. Air Force also has Defense Support Program satellites that use infrared sensors to detect heat from missile and booster plumes against Earth’s background. That was how United States could tell in lightning speed it was the Russian-made Buk ground-to-air missile that destroyed the Boeing 777-200ER, and Russia doesn’t deny it. But despite knowing the type of weapon that hit the plane, the greatest challenge is to prove who did it.

Malaysian Flight MH17 Shot Down - Rebels Discuss Shot Down

At this moment, all the three parties – the Ukranian government, the pro-Russian separatists and even the Russian government itself – have denied launching any Buk missile. The Ukranian National Security and Defense Council  said their army is not equipped with the Buk launcher. The rebel leaders said the same thing. But Russia has been accused of supplying the separatists with sophisticated and powerful weapons and this include Buk missile launcher.

Buk M1 - SA-11 Gadfly Missile Systems Spotted in TorezBuk M1 - SA-11 Gadfly Missile Systems Spotted in Torez Neighbourhood

Last month, Russian state media claimed the separatists have taken control of Buk missile system abandoned by the Ukranian army. So, it seems the separatists do have the deadly surface-to-air missile (SAM) – from either source. But the fact is all the three parties have the military expertise in operating and launching the missile. All of them could be lying about not having it.

Buk M1 - SA-11 Gadfly Missile Systems Spotted After Used With 2 Missiles Missing

Ukrainian spies have reported and filmed a suspect BUK missile launcher used in the attack which killed 298 innocent lives, with 2-missiles missing. There’re also tons of photos believed to be BUK SAM battery driven along a road in Torez, about 10-miles from the Malaysian MH17 crash area. The intelligence also believed the BUK SAM launcher together with the crews involved in the incident had been “terminated” by now to “eliminate evidence”. But what make BUK missile systems so deadly?

Buk M1 - SA-11 Gadfly Missile Systems Spotted Location in Map

Buk M1 - SA-11 Gadfly Missile Systems Spotted display

The Buk (which means beech tree in Russian), or Buk-M1 is also known as “SA-11 Gadfly” by United States and NATO. A newer version that is integrated with new missile is called Buk-M2 or simply “SA-17 Grizzly”. The latest version, Buk-M3, is scheduled for production. So it was either SA-11 or later version of SA-11’s that was used. The Buk missile system was designed by Russian designer Ardalion Rastov to replace its predecessor, Kub system in 1979.


It is a self-propelled and vehicle-mounted surface-to-air missile systems specifically designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and drones. Carrying 4-missiles on a tracked vehicle follows by a separate vehicle that carries early radars to guide the missiles, this mobility combination is what make the Buk missile systems extremely deadly.

Buk M1 - SA-11 Gadfly Missile Systems

Depending on the type of missiles, the SA-11’s system  could launch missile up to 72,000 feet (22,000 metres), easily breaching Malaysian MH17’s altitude of merely 33,000 feet. The most sophisticated version of Buk is SA-21 Growler introduced by Russia in 2004. Also known as S-400, only Russia operates it and it could reach up to 98,000 metres and track 35 aerodynamics targets.


The SA-11’s radar can scan 360 degrees. When its crew (presumably the rebels) detected Malaysian MH17 at around 53 miles (85km) away they would have had between five and 10 minutes to acquire the plane, fire a missile and relocate. They need to relocate immediately as the powerful radar would give away their position. Yeah, it’s a hit and run kind of warfare.

Buk M1 - SA-11 Gadfly Missile Systems Battery

Buk M1 - SA-11 Gadfly Missile Systems - Inside

Some airliners flying in conflict zones have missile warning alerts, but it’s highly likely the Malaysian MH17 didn’t have one. The pilots and crew would probably have had no indication a missile was coming, hence no distress call or whatsoever. The missile would not have flown directly into the jet, but drawn up close beneath it (65-feet), then detonated causing critical damage to the aircraft and an explosion which would have ignited the fuel onboard; causing destruction of the wing, tail, and fuselage.



The missile could be fitted with different types of warheads and depending on how you want to destroy the target, it could either cut an aircraft in half, set it on fire or simply shred it apart. All the innocent lives onboard flight MH17 had no idea what hit them. At Mach-3, the 9M28M1 travels at 1,020 metre/sec or 3,346 feet/sec, and it took 9.86 seconds to reach the height of 33,000 feet, the spot that would seal the fate of flight MH17. With a success rate of between 90-95%, the aircraft was doomed the moment the button was pressed.

Malaysian Flight MH17 Shot Down - Buk 9M28M1 Took 9.86 Seconds To Reach MH17

Again, many are wondering if things could be better if Malaysian Airlines took “extreme” precautions measure such as re-route their flights to avoid the warzone airspace. Of course it does, but as usual, Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai and even PM Najib Razak argued that the area was safe and besides, if Singapore Airlines uses it (before the disaster), then it should be perfectly alright to do so.


Well, that’s the risk you’ve to take, but considering how unlucky MAS has been after the disappearance of MH370, not to mention its financial problems, the airline shouldn’t have took the gamble. Considering Singapore flight SQ351 was just 25 km away from flight MH17, you simply can’t discount the “luck” factor. Besides, South Korea’s Korean Air and Asiana, as well as Australia’s Qantas have re-routed all their flights as early as March this year when Russian troops moved into Crimea. So, why didn’t Malaysia?

Flight MH17 Incident - Passengers Nationalities


Other Articles That May Interest You …

Pin It

FinanceTwitter SignOff
If you enjoyed this post, what shall you do next? Consider:

Like FinanceTwitter Tweet FinanceTwitter Subscribe Newsletter   Leave Comment Share With Others


The main and obvious reason for MAS not rerouting the flight path is due to money. To divert the path instead of flying straight through Ukrainian airspace is much more expensive.

And since ICAO did not declare the airspace as a NO FLY zone, MAS just assume it’s okay.

Of course, it’s all about saving fuel cost hence the shortest route possible … But that’s the risk MAS has to take …

And now they’re to convince the international judges, should there be lawsuits, that there was no element of “negligence” in their decision …

It was like saying – since other motorists beat “yellow” traffic light, it should be OK to do so … And now accident happened, MAS has to justify its action …

Cheers …

Ukraine army try to shot-down Putin plane, not a Malasya. Photo’s is fake.

if it’s true, test, then why the pro-Russian rebels tampered and destroyed the crash site? … should’t they preserve it instead so that investigators can prove it was the ukraine that fired the missile?

Did you know the Missile leaves green marks?

Dutch reported made some photos:


Everyone and their dogs knows the Russians had nothing to do with MH17, the US was planning a false flag with an airline even before MH17, Russian hackers leaked a plot at the Mariupol Airport, MH17 was shot down by either a Ukrainian Su-25 or an Israel F-15, either way Israel was involved, a Israel Python Missile was used and the secret Azerbaijani Israeli airbase had fighters take off, this isn’t the only time, the Russian flight to Egypt was shot down over the Med during a large Israeli air exercise, Israel is supporting the destruction of Syria due to Syria support of Hezbollah which defeated Israeli aggression in Lebanon. Its time to bring justice to the victims, they died in order for Russia to be blamed, to blaming Russia only plays into the hands of the killers who did this terrible act.

Leave a Reply


(required)(will not be published)