Mahathir Hired The Right Man – After Equanimity, A.G. Thomas To Recover RM24.17 Billion In 1MDB-IPIC Payments

Pin It

Oct 31 2018
Linked In

Tommy Thomas was initially rejected as Malaysia’s next Attorney General when Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad proposed his name. Even the “Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Muhammad V (the King)” disagreed with the appointment of the senior lawyer as the country’s top legal adviser. The excuse – not only he isn’t a Malay-Muslim but an ethnic-Indian, he is also a Christian.


After Mr. Thomas received massive support from Malaysians, especially the netizens, the King had a new twist – he wanted somebody who had been a judge or even a retired judge. The King also argued he wanted an A.G. who is able to advise him on Shariah matters. Mahathir, nevertheless, countered that the Solicitor General can handle that job. Still, the King insisted the A.G. should be the one advising him.


However, the 93-year-old PM refused to budge and stood his ground. That had terrified the monarch. In fact, Mahathir was ready to start a Constitutional Crisis with the monarchy, considering he deliberately proposed only one name – Tommy Thomas. And when the monarch tried to be funny, probably emboldened by UMNO racist supporters, Mahathir fired a warning shot.

Attorney General Tommy Thomas - Constitutional Law Expert and Civil Litigator

On June 3 (Sunday), Mahathir declared that his administration will not submit any other names for the position of attorney-general, as the Malay rulers prepare to gather for an emergency meeting in Kuala Lumpur on Tuesday over the matter. “Under the federal constitution, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has to act (to appoint the A-G) on the advice of the prime minister,” – warned the prime minister.


It was over before the rulers emergency meeting can even begin. Had Mahathir bent over and kissed the hands of the monarch like Anwar Ibrahim, the US$250 million superyacht Equanimity bought with stolen money by Jho Low would most probably had sailed for the United States. Malaysia would be at the mercy of the U.S. for whatever leftover crumbs arising from the sale of the yacht.


Working with the best brains, including Ms Sitpah Selvaratnam, the Attorney General Chambers quickly and efficiently invoked the Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur against the yacht, and on 6th August 2018, the Court issued a Warrant of Arrest against it. Thanks to Tommy Thomas, Malaysia has finally started the auction of the Equanimity.

The Equanimity Super Yacht - Rear View

But saving the country hundreds of millions of ringgit in claiming the yacht was just the appetizer. The attorney general, attacked by racists and extremists belonging to UMNO-Malays and PAS Islamist party, is now trying to save a staggering US$5.78 billion (£4.53 billion; RM24.17 billion) of taxpayers money which otherwise would go into paying Abu Dhabi’s IPIC.


Unlike his incompetent and corrupt predecessor – former A.G. Apandi Ali – who was caught dancing with disgraced ex-premier Najib Razak’s band of crooked ministers, A.G. Tommy Thomas has been working quietly on the Abu Dhabi’s International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC) case. Now, Mr. Thomas will show why meritocracy, not kleptocracy, is important to the country.


Thanks to Najib Razak, an arbitration tribunal sitting in London had on May 9, 2017 recorded a consent award for Malaysia to pay US$5.78 billion (£4.53 billion; RM24.17 billion) to IPIC and the bond trustee over a five-year period. So far, US$1.46 billion (RM6.1 billion) has been paid, leaving a balance of US$4.32 billion (RM18.1 billion) – with the next interest payment of US$50 million (RM209 million) due on Nov 11.

Abu Dhabi IPIC - International Petroleum Investment Company

But now the new Malaysian Government will apply to the High Court in London for an order to set aside the US$5.78 billion consent award. Essentially, if succeeded, not only the country does not have to pay US$4.32 billion (£3.38 billion; RM18.1 billion) to Abu Dhabi, but will also able to recover the US$1.46 billion (£1.14 billion; RM6.1 billion) already paid.


Expressing his confidence that the Malaysian government has a “strong case”, Tommy justified the basis of Malaysia’s legal challenge was that the consent award was procured by fraud (committed by Najib Razak) or in a manner contrary to public policy. And Abu Dhabi’s IPIC or Aabar Investments PJS knew about the fraud but made the fraudulent claims anyway.


Apparently, Abu Dhabi’s IPIC or Aabar would have known of Najib’s alleged fraud by the time of U.S. attorney-general Loretta Lynch’s announcement in the DOJ’s July 2016 press conference of the department’s filing of several civil suits to freeze assets that it said were the result of US$3.5 billion that was misappropriated from 1MDB (1Malaysia Development Bhd) – a fund set up by Najib Razak in 2009.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch Announces Lawsuits On 1MDB

The theft, described as the “greatest kleptocracy in modern history”, was given tremendous global publicity, particularly in the political and business media. Tommy also said that Najib is identified as “MO1” in the DOJ pleadings and any reasonable reader reading these documents would immediately become aware of his central role in defrauding 1MDB to the benefit of himself, his stepson and Jho Low.


“In such circumstances, Malaysia takes the position that IPIC and Aabar were aware of the fraud of Najib Razak. He was principally responsible for 1MDB and Minister of Finance Inc. consenting to the Award. Every system of law would hold that he could not possibly have acted in the best interests of his country and his company,” – said A.G. Tommy Thomas.


Actually, Malaysia can sue U.A.E or Abu Dhabi because Khadem Al Qubaisi, former managing director of IPIC, was working with Jho Low (real-name: Low Taek Jho), whom in turn was Najib’s partner-in-crime in stealing or scamming Malaysia to the tune of US$3.51 billion. Its worth to note that 1MDB has claimed to have paid to the IPIC or its subsidiaries the money owed (US$3.51 billion).


However, Abu Dhabi said they had received none. As a result, 1MDB has to pay IPIC the US$3.51 billion all over again – for the second time – after claiming they had already paid the money. As it turned out, 1MDB had paid US$3.51 to Aabar Investments PJS Limited (Aabar BVI) – a fake subsidiary of IPIC (the real subsidiary is Aabar Investments PJS (Aabar)).


Strangely but interestingly, it was only after the filing of lawsuits by U.S. Department of Justice to seize assets that it said were the result of US$3.5 billion that was misappropriated from 1MDB that Abu Dhabi authorities moved in to arrest Mr. Khadem, the person entrusted with running Abu Dhabi’s US$80 billion sovereign-wealth fund.


Khadem Al Qubaisi, who was working hand-in-glove with partner-in-crime Jho Low, received at least US$470 million of money siphoned from 1MDB. In 2016, Jho Low was involved in the process of trying to stop the U.S. from seizing US$650 million in real estate and business investments the U.S. government claims were acquired with funds stolen from his home country – Malaysia.

Attorney General - Hired Tommy Thomas and Fired Apandi Ali

Had Mahathir appointed another incompetent attorney general similar to the disgraced Apandi Ali, just for the sake of appointing a Malay-Muslim, it could be business as usual today. Malaysian taxpayers would continue to pay interest payment of US$50 million periodically and the two final bullet payments of US$1.8 billion each for the principal until April 2022. There won’t be any Equanimity, of course.


Now, do you understand why it’s so important to hire the right person based on meritocracy for the job, regardless of his or her race or religion? Apandi Ali, a Malay-Muslim, was appointed by Najib Razak as the attorney general and endorsed by the King without any objection. But what had he done? He cleared Najib or any wrongdoing and he allowed Abu Dhabi to rape Malaysians – including the Malay-Muslims – of RM24.17 billion.


Other Articles That May Interest You …

Pin It

FinanceTwitter SignOff
If you enjoyed this post, what shall you do next? Consider:

Like FinanceTwitter Tweet FinanceTwitter Subscribe Newsletter   Leave Comment Share With Others


If he wins the case, the savings would pay for his salary many, many times over. Yes, well worth it.

Leave a Reply


(required)(will not be published)