×
Menu
Search

Lina Joy Losses Appeal – More to Come?



Pin It


May 30 2007
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
Pinterest
Linked In
As expected, Lina Joy lost her final round of appeal when the Federal Court dismissed on Wednesday her appeal against a ruling that the National Registration Department was right not to allow her to remove the word “Islam” from her identity card. On Sept 19, 2005, the Court of Appeal decided that the NRD director-general was right in refusing her application to drop her religious status from her IC on the grounds that the Syariah Court and other Islamic religious authorities did not confirm Linas renunciation of Islam.

Chief Justice Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim and Federal Court judge Justice Alauddin Mohd Sheriff delivered the majority decision dismissing her appeal. Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Justice Richard Malanjum dissented. Lina Joy, 42, who was born to a Malay Muslim couple, became a Christian when she was 26. The sales assistant has taken her case all the way to the Federal Court because unless the government recognizes her conversion, she cannot get married under civil law. As long as the word “Islam” remains on her identity card, Lina cannot marry her Christian boyfriend, a cook, under the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976.

While Lina managed – the second time around – to get the National Registration Department to change her name from Azlina Jailani in 1999, accepting that she had renounced Islam, it refused to remove the word “Islam” from her MyKad.
In 2001, she took her case against the NRD director-general, the Government and the Federal Territory Religious Council to the High Court. She lost – Justice Faiza Tamby Chik held that Malays could not renounce Islam because a Malay was defined in the Constitution as “a person who professes the religion of Islam,” adding it was the syariah court that had the jurisdiction in matters related to apostasy.
Back in Dec 2005, a controversy was triggered following the death of Mount Everest climber Sergeant M. Moorthy alias Muhammad Abdullah. His widow, S. Kaliammal, and the Federal Territory Islamic Religious Council were embroiled in a legal tussle over the right to bury him when it was discovered that he had converted to Islam the previous year. His widow, however, sought a declaration in the civil court that Moorthy lived a Hindu life.
On Dec 28, 2005, the High Court ruled that it would not disturb the declaration that Moorthy was a Muslim because the latter was under the purview of the Syariah Court system and he was eventually buried according to Muslim rites. I’m just wondering if Moorthy would be involved in such a tussle if he’s not a Mount Everest hero.
Apostasy, considered one of Islam’s greatest sins, is punishable by imprisonment or a fine under Malaysia’s sharia law. Converts also face being sent to “rehabilitation” centers where caning is one of the methods used to force converts to recant. While most prefer to keep silent about their conversion or flee to another country, Joy decided 10 years ago to sue the department in the secular civil courts.

As for Lina Joy case, its’ puzzling why would the authority insists on keeping her status as a Muslim when at the first place the National Registration Department agreed to change her name – a signal equals to recognition that she’s already no longer a Muslim. Weird isn’t it? Just to put her into difficult situation in getting married to a non-Muslim guy? Will this case be used as the benchmark for any similar cases to come? But I thought Malaysia is a democratic country which is going to celebrate its’ 50th Independence in another three months and according to the Constitution (Article 11) everyone is guaranteed the freedom to practice his/her religion belief.

Would the result be any difference if the judges consist of equal number of judge from different religion, such as 2 Muslim-judges, 2 Indian-Hindu judges, 2 Chinese-Buddhist judges and 2 Christian-judges? This would be a marvelous idea as every opinion would be put on the table for a fair judgment. But that would be next to impossible in Malaysia.


Pin It

FinanceTwitter SignOff
If you enjoyed this post, what shall you do next? Consider:



Like FinanceTwitter Tweet FinanceTwitter Subscribe Newsletter   Leave Comment Share With Others


Comments

u are damn right. it’s impossible in malaysia; a county ruled by a race that contradicts themselves in all ways possible

Yes what a sad day for Malaysia. The court verdict against Lina Joy has destroyed her bid to have her religious choice be seen as a matter of personal conscience rather than a state imposed obligation. Whilst the angry young men rejoice and shout “Allah-o-Akbar”, the Muslim religion again trumps the constitution and provides yet another early indication that the cracks are widening in this so called rights based democracy.

This verdict and other sad cases such as that of Subashini Rajasperhaps, may mean that the country’s tourist promotion board needs to rework its “Truly Asia” campaign. Perhaps now they need to market as ‘Malaysia truly Arabia’. Actually the government sometime back removed its English street names so it should be no problem for them to re-brand KL as the centre of “ASIARABIA” and perhaps they could call it ‘Riyadh Lumpur’. Oh yes and of course Putrajaya could become Meccaminor.

Now get the tune in the head and its… Malaysia…. truly Arabia… yessssirrrr sounds great.

Ric
http://caliibre.blogspot.com/

To be honest, I wish everyone would just leave her alone. I’m Muslim myself and cannot practise my Islam in a Muslim country not just because of the Muslims who hammer me with minor issues such as the way I dress or who I choose to be with but also discrimination from non Muslims too. It’s all too easy to blame one group for the country’s problems, but without each other, Malaysia wouldn’t even have half of what it does now, facility wise. Plenty of Muslims convert OUT of Islam but there are plenty who convert INTO Islam, but as usual us Asians prefer to focus on issues that needn’t be priorotised like someone’s private life. The country needs a major overhaul. Let it be Muslim, by all means, if non Musims don’t like it, then the world is their oyster, and they can join in terrorist tirades written by right winged Western newspapers as much as they want. But, a message to all you Muslim Brothers & Sisters, please grow up. Equating Malay with Muslim is frankly, just bulls**t. Malays are a hybrid race, and Islam condemns racism if it ever needs to see it, which in most Muslim communities, it doesn’t need to. Why in Malaysia? And for all you Non Muslim Malaysians out there, not all Muslims are terrorists, and we face discrimination too, especially from disgruntled and angry folks like you who also, for some reason equate Islam with beng Malay despite calling yourself smarter and more educated.

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)(will not be published)