The gadget can’t possibly be “AirPods”, because she was caught wearing it before Apple gets to release iPhone 7 commercially. The Chinese students would gladly pay top dollar for the gadget so that they can cheat in their university “Gaokao” entrance examination. The spyware gadget looks very well hidden due to its flesh-coloured, suggesting she did not want people to discover it.
So, why was Hillary Clinton wearing an earpiece (or possible a pair of it) at the Presidential Forum on Wednesday evening? You can’t read this piece of news on mainstream media because it’s an open secret all of them are on Clinton’s side. They prefer to attack Donald Trump, who was at the same forum as well – on petty issues.
As the media open fires at Donald Trump for praising Vladimir Putin, again, at the “Commander in Chief” forum hosted by NBC news, social media which are beyond politicians’ control are on overdrive about the latest discovery, first exposed by True-Pundit. Photos of Hillary Clinton wearing the earpiece have prompted various naughty speculations.
The most outstanding speculation was Hillary Clinton, due to her excessive lies, had no choice but to continue lying because to stop doing so would mean her previous lies would be exposed. Therefore, she would need every help possible especially during a live prime-time forum, so that she didn’t accidently shoot herself on the foot.
Naughty suggestions include jamming Clinton’s future public forum, conference, debate, talk or anything to confuse and embarrass her. Imagine Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton caught saying “Please repeat that, I can’t hear you, Roger” after being jammed. Some thought it would be fun to hack her frequency and guide her into saying “I urge you to vote for Trump”. (*grin*)
As the buzz over Hillary Clinton wearing earpiece spread like wildfire in social media, her spokesman Nick Merrill rubbished her boss wore such stealthy communications device. Mr. Nick simply said what is seen in the photo is merely a reflection of the TV lights or a flash. Clearly, Clinton’s camp lies – again.
It would be more believable if Clinton’s spokesman has had claimed it was merely ear grease (*grin*). Now, do you understand why Hillary would normally laughs uncontrollably when she was asked a question? That’s because her “EarPods” was malfunctioning, or she couldn’t hear what was coming from the other side, or she had accidently dropped it.
Thanks to WikiLeaks, an email sent by Clinton’s most “trusted friend” Huma Abedin dated September 24, 2009 – “Did you take your earpiece or do I need to get it?” – is the first proof that Nick Merrill has lied about Clinton having no need for such gadget. It also confirms unnamed New York police sources saying Clinton was wearing an “inductive earpiece”.
Such “EarPods”, the kind of tech used by stage actors in need of prompting to recite forgotten lines, has brought back past memory where former President George W. Bush was accused of wearing gadgets after debates in the 2004 campaign. But instead of “earpiece”, Bush was suspected of needing someone to feed him answers after photos showed a bulge under the back of his suit jacket.
Besides needing assistance to coach Hillary Clinton on answering questions during her present presidential campaign, is there any other explanation, something which perhaps is related to her health condition? If she hadn’t cheated like Bush, Clinton’s wearing “EarPods” could confirm the concerns that she is not medically fit to become the next president.
She has been displaying endless coughing and was exposed of dispatching her executive staff – Jake Sullivan – to conduct research on Provigil, a controlled drug often prescribed for patients suffering from Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and Multiple Sclerosis. A simple Google search shows Parkinson’s disease may result in hearing loss.
A research done by Johns Hopkins University schools of medicine and public health shows that hearing loss is linked to Alzheimer’s disease due to accelerated brain tissue loss. Responding to a survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) 71% of 250 physicians say Clinton could be disqualifying for the position of President of the U.S.
While more than 81% were aware of her history of a concussion, only 59% were aware of the cerebral sinus thrombosis, and 52% of the history of deep venous thrombosis. Nearly two-thirds said that a physician who had a concern about a candidate’s fitness to serve for health reasons should “make the concerns known to the public.”
With the U.S. Presidential Election 2016 on 8, November, it appears the Democratic Party and Clinton supporters have no choice but to drag their candidate to the finish line – by hook or by crook. They would rather get a potentially brain-damaged Hillary Clinton to the White House, than Donald Trump who is unwilling to be controlled by seasoned politicians.
Other Articles That May Interest You …
- New iPhone 7 Revealed – “Courage” … Or Was It “Desperate”?
- Medically Unfit – Hillary Clinton Could Be Suffering From Parkinson’s / Alzheimer’s
- Gaokao Exam Season – China Uni Entrance Exam Cheats To Get 7-Year Prison
- U.S. Held Hostage – Obama Secretly Sent A Plane Of $400 Million Cash To Iran
- Day-1 Of Chaos – Clinton In Trouble As Supporters Boo & Fight Each Other
- No Wonder Putin Laughs At America – F.B.I. & A.G. Cover-Up Clinton Scandal
- Obama’s Latest Cover-Up: Censoring “ISIS” & “Islamic State” In Orlando 911 Calls
- Obama Picks Najib As Friend Because The President Is Mentally Unwell?
- Osama’s Real Killing Story – The Biggest Lie From President Obama?